Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:03

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Every Hideo Kojima Game Ranked - IGN
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Scientists say a tiny brown moth navigates 600 miles using stars — just like humans and birds - CNN
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Who’ll be the odd man out in the Cleveland quarterback battle? - NBC Sports
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
VIDEO: Breaking down Lions rookie DB Dan Jackson’s tape - Pride Of Detroit
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What are some cool examples of two kinds of people?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do I sweat so much at the gym?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.